HOME
|
What's New!
|
Contact Us
|
Site Map
| Sign In
Training
Find Training
NIC Learning Center
Video / Satellite
Resources for Trainers
About Our Training
Services
Technical Assistance
Research Assistance
Library
Browse the Online Library
Web Site Directory
Popular Topics
Ask A Research Expert
About the Library
Community
Corrections News/Blogs
Discussion Forums
Shared Files
FREE! Join Now!
Projects
Learn about what we are working on and locate opportunities for assistance, research, and training related to key topics in corrections.
About Us
Overview
Divisions
History
Mission & Goals
Organizational Structure
Advisory Board
Employment Opportunities
Cooperative Agreements
Publications
New in the Library
» "
Youth in the Juvenile Justice System
"
Library
Corrections Library
Self-Study Options
Browse Online Library
Web Site Directory
Popular Topics
Online Curricula
Video Learning
Assisted Research
Ask A Research Expert
Ask Your Colleagues
Loading...
One Year Out: Experiences of Prisoners Returning to Cleveland
View/Download
One Year Out: Experiences of Prisoners Returning to Cleveland
Downloaded 50 times since 05/04/2007.
Author(s)
Visher, Christy A.
Courtney, Shannon M.E.
Source(s)
Urban Institute. Justice Policy Center (Washington, DC)
Sponsor(s)
George Gund Foundation (Cleveland, OH)
Health Foundation of Greater Cincinnati (Cincinnati, OH)
Cleveland Foundation (Cleveland, OH)
Smith Richardson Foundation (Westport, CT)
Annie E. Casey Foundation (Baltimore, MD)
Ohio. Office of Criminal Justice Services (Columbus, OH)
Ohio Dept. of Rehabilitation and Correction (Columbus, OH)
Details
Published 2007.
15 pages.
Related Topics
Evaluation program
(Statistics &Research)
Offender reintegration
(Reentry)
Ohio
"This research brief is intended to serve as a foundation for policy discussions about how released prisoners can successfully reintegrate into their communities, whether in Cleveland or in similar cities around the country" (p. 1). Sections of this report include: key findings, housing and community residence; employment and financial circumstances; family and peers; program participation and postrelease attitudes; physical and mental health; profile of study participants; substance use; postrelease supervision; criminal involvement; understanding reentry success and failure; and summary and policy implications.
Accession Number: 022266
Related Documents
Evaluability assessment helps to determine whether a program has been planned and implemented well enough to be evaluated. This monograph focuses on ...
::
View Details
Evaluability Assessment: A Tool for Program Development in Corrections
A system assessment is a collaborative effort between a jurisdiction, the National Institute of Corrections, and consultants to develop a shared ...
::
View Details
Guide to a Criminal Justice System Assessment: A Work in Progress
Access to research findings based upon studies done by a research team lead by Dr. Doris Mackenzie is provided at this website. Points of ingress ...
::
View Details
Evaluating Corrections &Sentencing
The utilization of "simple but potentially powerful evaluation methods" is discussed. The following chapters comprise this report: introducing ...
::
View Details
Guide to Frugal Evaluation for Criminal Justice
A paper that will "briefly examine some of the major forces that are driving correctional agencies across the country to identify and incorporate ...
::
View Details
Performance Measures and Strategic Planning for Corrections
...
::
View Details
Correctional Master Planning
The accidental placement of maximum custody inmates into general population housing is investigated. Sections following an executive summary are: ...
::
View Details
Special Review: Improper Housing of Maximum Custody Inmates at California State Prison Reception Centers
This report provides the results of an assessment of the Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC) program. TASC is an offender case management ...
::
View Details
Drug Control: Treatment Alternatives Program for Drug Offenders Needs Stronger Emphasis
Through case studies of six federal agencies, researchers reviewed their federal performance management systems, with the intention of identifying ...
::
View Details
Federal Performance Management: Agencies Need Greater Flexibility in Designing Their Systems
This study of classification systems has two purposes. The first is to test new methods for evaluating objective prison classification systems by ...
::
View Details
Understanding Why Inmates Are Misclassified: The Use of Qualitative Methods in Evaluating Objective Prison Classification
Viewed 5228 times since 05/04/2007
| Last Modified: 5/4/2007 1:38:34 PM
::
USA.gov
>
U.S. Dept. of Justice
>
Bureau of Prisons
>
National Institute of Corrections
>
.::
Privacy & Disclaimers
::
Accessibility
::.